R. P. Verhoeff, A. J. Waarlo, and K. T. Boersma, Systems Modelling and the Development of Coherent Understanding of, Cell Biology. International Journal of Science Education, vol.30, pp.543-568, 2008.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00513340

F. Flores, M. E. Tovar, and L. Gallegos, Representation of the cell and its processes in high school students: An integrated view, International Journal of Science Education, vol.25, pp.269-286, 2003.

L. A. Tibell and C. Rundgren, Educational Challenges of Molecular Life Science: Characteristics and Implications for Education and Research. CBE-Life Sciences Education, vol.9, pp.25-33, 2010.

G. Marsh, T. Parkes, and C. Boulter, Children's Understanding of Scale-The Use of Microscopes, School Science Review, vol.82, pp.27-31, 2001.

K. Garvin-doxas and M. W. Klymkowsky, Understanding Randomness and its Impact on Student Learning: Lessons Learned from Building the Biology Concept Inventory (BCI). CBE Life Sciences Education, vol.7, pp.227-233, 2008.

C. Rundgren and L. A. Tibell, Critical features of visualizations of transport through the cell membrane-an empirical study of upper secondary and tertiary students' meaningmaking of a still image and an animation, International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, vol.8, pp.223-246, 2010.

C. Tekkaya, Remediating High School Students' Misconceptions Concerning Diffusion and Osmosis through Concept Mapping and Conceptual Change Text, Research in Science & Technological Education, vol.21, pp.5-16, 2003.

F. Oztas, How do High School Students Know Diffusion and Osmosis?, High School Students' Difficulties in Understanding Diffusion & Osmosis. Procedia -Social and Behavioral Sciences, vol.116, pp.3679-3682, 2014.

M. Webb, M. Tracey, W. Harwin, O. Tokatli, F. Hwang et al., The potential for haptic-enabled interaction to support collaborative learning in school biology, Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, pp.927-935, 2017.

H. Tuckey and M. Selvaratnam, Studies Involving Three-Dimensional Visualisation Skills in Chemistry: A Review, Studies in Science Education, vol.21, pp.99-121, 1993.

A. Paivio, Mental imagery in associative learning and memory, Psychological Review, vol.76, p.241, 1969.

A. Paivio, Intelligence, dual coding theory, and the brain, vol.47, pp.141-158, 2014.

P. Strzyz, Connections, connections, connections, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, vol.18, p.139, 2017.

L. Mali?ska, E. Rybska, E. Sobieszczuk-nowicka, and M. Adamiec, Teaching about Water Relations in Plant Cells: An Uneasy Struggle, CBE-Life Sciences Education, p.15, 2016.

D. Deng, C. Xu, P. Sun, J. Wu, C. Yan et al., Crystal structure of the human glucose transporter GLUT1, Nature, vol.510, p.121, 2014.

S. Lukas, A. M. Philipp, and I. Koch, Switching attention between modalities: further evidence for visual dominance, Psychological Research PRPF, vol.74, pp.255-267, 2010.

M. I. Posner, M. J. Nissen, and R. M. Klein, Visual dominance: An information-processing account of its origins and significance, Psychological Review, vol.83, p.157, 1976.

B. Wahn and P. König, Is Attentional Resource Allocation Across Sensory Modalities Task-Dependent?, Advances in Cognitive Psychology, vol.13, pp.83-96, 2017.

Y. Gaffary, B. L. Gouis, M. Marchal, F. Argelaguet, B. Arnaldi et al., AR Feels than VR: Haptic Perception of Stiffness in Augmented versus Virtual Reality, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, vol.23, pp.2372-2377, 2017.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01625290

C. Jonas, M. J. Spiller, P. B. Hibbard, and M. Proulx, Introduction to the Special Issue on Individual Differences in Multisensory Perception: an Overview, Multisensory Research, vol.30, pp.461-466, 2017.

N. Enayati, E. D. Momi, and G. Ferrigno, Haptics in Robot-Assisted Surgery: Challenges and Benefits, IEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering, vol.9, pp.49-65, 2016.