C. Parmar, P. Grossmann, J. Bussink, P. Lambin, and H. J. Aerts, Machine Learning methods for Quantitative Radiomic Biomarkers, vol.5, p.13087, 2015.

Y. Mansury, M. Kimura, J. Lobo, and T. S. Deisboeck, Emerging Patterns in Tumor Systems: Simulating the Dynamics of Multicellular Clusters with an Agent-based Spatial Agglomeration Model, Journal of Theoretical Biology, vol.219, issue.3, 2002.

V. Pianet, . Colin, &. Thierry, H. Loiseau, J. &-lafourcade et al., P12.23 Tumor growth model applied for meningiomas: first clinical validation, Neuro-Oncology, vol.19, pp.99-100, 2017.

A. Collin, D. Chapelle, and P. Moireau, A Luenberger observer for reaction-diffusion models with front position data, Journal of Computational Physics, vol.300, 2015.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01111675

T. Kritter, M. Rossi, T. Colin, F. H. Cornelis, L. Egesta et al., PhD Heterogeneity Index: a methionine PET based prognostic factor in low grade gliomas

M. Lê, H. Delingette, J. Kalpathy-cramer, E. Gerstner, T. Batchelor et al., MRI Based Bayesian Personalization of a Tumor Growth Model, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, vol.35, issue.10, pp.2329-2339, 2016.

T. Colin, F. Cornelis, J. Jouganous, J. Palussière, and O. Saut, Patient specific simulation of tumor growth, response to the treatment and relapse of a lung metastasis: a clinical case, Journal of Computational Surgery, vol.2, p.1, 2015.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01102586

E. Grenier, V. Louvet, and P. Vigneaux, Parameter estimation in non-linear mixed effects models with SAEM algorithm: Extension from ODE to PDE, ESAIM: Mathematical Modelling and Numerical Analysis, vol.48, issue.5, pp.1303-1329, 2014.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00936373

F. H. Cornelis, M. Martin, and O. Saut, Precision of manual two-dimensional segmentations of lung and liver metastases and its impact on tumor response assessment using RECIST 1.1, Eur Radiol Exp, vol.1, p.16, 2017.

A. Hawkins-daarud, S. K. Johnston, and K. R. Swanson, Quantifying Uncertainty and Robustness in a Biomathematical Model Based Patient-Specific Response Metric for Glioblastoma, p.325340

M. Rossi, Kaplain Meier curves on the cohort from Humanitas Hospital (in collaboration with, vol.18

, Three different stratifications are evaluated: by grade (where risk of relapse is directly related to grade), by IDH1 status (where we split patient regarding the IDH1 mutation status) and by our machine learning algorithm (which uses grade, IDH1 status as well as other clinical, omic or imaging features)