P. Tourani, Y. Jiang, and B. Adams, Monitoring sentiment in open source mailing lists: exploratory study on the apache ecosystem, Proceedings of 24th Annual International Conference on Computer Science and Software Engineering, pp.34-44, 2014.

I. Mistrík, Collaborative software engineering: challenges and prospects, Collaborative Software Engineering, pp.389-403, 2010.

C. Bird, Mining email social networks, Proceedings of the 2006 international workshop on Mining software repositories, pp.137-143, 2006.

E. Guzman, D. Azócar, and Y. Li, Sentiment analysis of commit comments in GitHub: an empirical study, Proceedings of the 11th Working Conference on Mining Software Repositories, pp.352-355, 2014.

P. C. Rigby, D. M. German, and M. A. Storey, Open source software peer review practices: a case study of the apache server, Proceedings of the 30th international conference on Software engineering, pp.541-550, 2008.

S. K. Sowe, I. Stamelos, and L. Angelis, Understanding knowledge sharing activities in free/open source software projects: An empirical study, Journal of Systems and Software, vol.81, issue.3, pp.431-446, 2008.

K. Y. Sharif, An empirically-based characterization and quantification of information seeking through mailing lists during open source developers' software evolution, Information and Software Technology, vol.57, pp.77-94, 2015.

A. Guzzi, Communication in open source software development mailing lists, Proceedings of the 10th Working Conference on Mining Software Repositories, pp.277-286, 2013.

A. Rousinopoulos, G. Robles, and J. González-barahona, Sentiment Analysis Of Free / Open Source Developers: Preliminary Findings From a Case Study, Electronic Journal Of Information Systems, vol.13, issue.2, 2014.

D. Pletea, B. Vasilescu, and A. Serebrenik, Security and emotion: sentiment analysis of security discussions on GitHub, Proceedings of the 11th working conference on mining software repositories, pp.348-351, 2014.

R. Paul, A. Bosu, and K. Z. Sultana, Expressions of Sentiments During Code Reviews: Male vs. Female, 2018.

V. Sinha, A. Lazar, and B. Sharif, Analyzing developer sentiment in commit logs, Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Mining Software Repositories, pp.520-523, 2016.

M. De-choudhury and S. Counts, Understanding affect in the workplace via social media, Proceedings of the 2013 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, pp.303-316, 2013.

J. Carver, Gender, sentiment and emotions, and safety-critical systems, IEEE Software, vol.35, issue.6, pp.16-19, 2018.

M. Ozer and D. Vogel, Contextualized relationship between knowledge sharing and performance in software development, Journal of Management Information Systems, vol.32, issue.2, pp.134-161, 2015.

H. Hasan and S. Banna, The unit of analysis in IS theory: The case for activity. Information Systems Foundations, 2012.

Y. Engeström, Expansive learning at work: Toward an activity theoretical reconceptualization, vol.14, pp.133-156, 2001.

Y. Engestrom, Activity theory as a framework for analyzing and redesigning work, Ergonomics, vol.43, issue.7, pp.960-974, 2000.

Y. Engeström and A. Sannino, Discursive manifestations of contradictions in organizational change efforts: A methodological framework, Journal of Organizational Change Management, vol.24, issue.3, pp.368-387, 2011.

M. Germonprez and M. Levy, Is it Egalitarianism or Enterprise Strategy? Exploring a New Method of Innovation in Open Source, 2015.

M. Metcalfe, Theory: Seeking a plain English explanation, JITTA: Journal of Information Technology Theory and Application, vol.6, issue.2, p.13, 2004.

K. E. Weick, Theory construction as disciplined imagination, vol.14, pp.516-531, 1989.

B. Fitzgerald and F. Adam, The status of the IS field: historical perspective and practical orientation, 2000.

C. Banville and M. Landry, Can the Field of MIS be Disciplined? Communications of the ACM, vol.32, pp.48-60, 1989.

R. Hirschheim, H. K. Klein, and K. Lyytinen, Exploring the intellectual structures of information systems development: a social action theoretic analysis. Accounting, Management and Information Technologies, vol.6, pp.1-64, 1996.

Y. Engeström and H. Kerosuo, From workplace learning to inter-organizational learning and back: the contribution of activity theory, Journal of Workplace Learning, vol.19, issue.6, pp.336-342, 2007.

A. Aue and M. Gamon, Customizing sentiment classifiers to new domains: A case study, Proceedings of recent advances in natural language processing (RANLP), vol.1, pp.2-3, 2005.

P. D. Turney, Thumbs up or thumbs down?: semantic orientation applied to unsupervised classification of reviews, Proceedings of the 40th annual meeting on association for computational linguistics, pp.417-424, 2002.

M. Cole and Y. Engeström, A cultural-historical approach to distributed cognition, 30. Ilyenkov, E.V., Activity and knowledge. Philosophy and culture, pp.1-46, 1974.

S. Karanasios and D. Allen, Mobile technology in mobile work: contradictions and congruencies in activity systems, European Journal of Information Systems, vol.23, issue.5, pp.529-542, 2014.

Y. Engestrom, Learning by expanding. Helsinki: Orienta-Konsultit Oy, 1987.

S. Karanasios, K. Riisla, and B. Simeonova, Exploring the use of contradictions in activity theory studies: An interdisciplinary review, 2017.

S. Karanasios, Toward a unified view of technology and activity: The contribution of activity theory to information systems research, Information Technology & People, vol.31, issue.1, pp.134-155, 2018.

D. K. Allen, How Should Technology-Mediated Organizational Change Be Explained? A Comparison of the Contributions of Critical Realism and Activity Theory, vol.37, pp.835-854, 2013.

L. White, K. Burger, and M. Yearworth, Understanding behaviour in problem structuring methods interventions with activity theory, European Journal of Operational Research, vol.249, issue.3, pp.983-1004, 2016.

M. Helle, Disturbances and contradictions as tools for understanding work in the newsroom, Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems, vol.12, issue.1, p.7, 2000.

K. Kuutti, Activity theory as a potential framework for human-computer interaction research. Context and consciousness: Activity theory and human-computer interaction, pp.17-44, 1995.

P. Capper and B. Williams, Enhancing evaluation using systems concepts, 2004.

P. Dionne and S. Bourdon, Contradictions as the driving force of collective and subjective development group employment programmes, Journal of Education and Work, pp.1-14, 2018.

C. K. De-dreu, E. Van-de, and . Vliert, Introduction: Using conflict in organizations, 1997.

B. Lin, Sentiment analysis for software engineering: How far can we go, 2018 IEEE/ACM 40th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE), pp.94-104, 2018.

N. Novielli, D. Girardi, and F. Lanubile, A Benchmark Study on Sentiment Analysis for Software Engineering Research, Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Mining Software Repositories, pp.364-375, 2018.

R. Jongeling, S. Datta, and A. Serebrenik, Choosing your weapons: On sentiment analysis tools for software engineering research, 2015 IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance and Evolution (ICSME), pp.531-535

, , 2015.

M. Moos, J. Andrey, and L. C. Johnson, The sustainability of telework: an ecological-footprinting approach, Sustainability: Science, Practice and Policy, vol.2, issue.1, pp.3-14, 2006.

I. O. Pappas, Big data and business analytics ecosystems: paving the way towards digital transformation and sustainable societies, 2018.

D. S. Rogers, A vision for human well-being: transition to social sustainability, Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, vol.4, issue.1, pp.61-73, 2012.