An Evaluation of OCR Accuracy, 1993. ,
The Third Annual Test of OCR Accuracy, Annual Research Report, pp.11-38, 1994. ,
The Fourth AnnuaI Test of OCR Accuracy, ISRI 1995 Annual Research Report, p.49, 1995. ,
The OCR Experimental Environment, Version 3, Annual Research Report, pp.83-86, 1993. ,
Optical Charcater Recognition : An illustrated guide to the frontier, 1999. ,
String Matching for Pattern Recognition, Bunke and A. Sanfeliu Structural Pattern Analysis, pp.119-144, 1990. ,
AN ALGORITHM FOR MATCHING OCR-GENERATED TEXT STRINGS, International Journal of Pattern Recognition and Artificial Intelligence, vol.08, issue.05, pp.1259-1266, 1994. ,
DOI : 10.1142/S0218001494000632
The String-to-String Correction Problem, Journal of the ACM, vol.21, issue.1, pp.168-173, 1974. ,
DOI : 10.1145/321796.321811
Approximate String Matching, ACM Computing Surveys, vol.12, issue.4, pp.381-402, 1980. ,
DOI : 10.1145/356827.356830
A faster algorithm computing string edit distances, Journal of Computer and System Sciences, vol.20, issue.1, pp.18-31, 1980. ,
DOI : 10.1016/0022-0000(80)90002-1
URL : http://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0000(80)90002-1
On optimum recognition error and reject tradeoff, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, vol.16, issue.1, pp.41-46, 1970. ,
DOI : 10.1109/TIT.1970.1054406
URL : http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/6177#files-area
Handbook of Character Recognition and Document Image Analysis, Benchmarking DIA Systems, pp.801-820 ,
A File Comparison Program, Software, Practice and Experience, pp.1025-1065 ,
DOI : 10.1002/spe.4380151102
URL : http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.189.70
BENCHMARKING: The Search for Industry Best Practices that Lead to Superior Performance, 1989. ,
Performance metrics for document understanding systems, Proceedings of 2nd International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition (ICDAR '93), pp.424-427, 1993. ,
DOI : 10.1109/ICDAR.1993.395703
Performance Evaluation of Two OCR Systems, Proc. SDAIR '94, pp.299-317, 1994. ,
Automated evaluation of OCR zoning, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol.17, issue.1, pp.86-90, 1995. ,
DOI : 10.1109/34.368146
Benchmarking of Document Page Segmentation, Part of the IS&T/SPIE Conference on Document Recognition and Retrieval VII, pp.165-171, 2000. ,
A region-based system for the automatic evaluation of page segmentation algorithms, Proceedings od DAS'94, pp.29-41, 1994. ,
Benchmarking page segmentation algorithms, Proceedings of IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition CVPR-94, pp.411-416, 1994. ,
DOI : 10.1109/CVPR.1994.323859
Ground-truthing and benchmarking document page segmentation, Proceedings of 3rd International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition, pp.601-604, 1995. ,
DOI : 10.1109/ICDAR.1995.601968
A General Approach to Quality Evaluation of Document Segmentation Results, Proceedings of the International Association for Pattem Recognition Workshop on Document Analysis Systems DAS98, pp.79-88, 1998. ,
DOI : 10.1007/3-540-48172-9_5
A preliminary evaluation of automatic zoning, Annual Research Report, K. 0. Grover, pp.35-45, 1993. ,
Automated evaluation of OCR zoning, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol.17, issue.1, pp.86-90, 1995. ,
DOI : 10.1109/34.368146
Techniques for Improving OCR Results Handbook of Character Recognition and Document Image Analysis, pp.227-258 ,
Combining the Classification Results of Independent Classifiers Based on the Dempster/Shafer Theory of Evidence, In Pattern Recognition and Artificial Intelligence, pp.381-393, 1998. ,
DOI : 10.1016/B978-0-444-87137-4.50032-1
DAFS: Document Attribute Format Specification, 1995. ,
HOW CAN PERMUTATIONS BE USED IN THE EVALUATION OF ZONING ALGORITHMS?, International Journal of Pattern Recognition and Artificial Intelligence, vol.10, issue.03, pp.223-237, 1996. ,
DOI : 10.1142/S0218001496000177
A fast Algorithm for Computing Longest Common SubsequencesDesign Patterns: Elements of Reusable Object-Oriented Software, Communications of the ACM, vol.2032, issue.5, pp.350-353, 1995. ,
10] ont proposé une méthode d'évaluation récursive de la distance d'édition, basée sur la notion de trace. La trace permet : ? de décomposer le processus de comparaison en l'optimisant localement ,