Changing our view on design evaluation meetings methodology: a study of software technical review meetings

Patrick D'Astous 1 Françoise Détienne 2 Willemien Visser 2 Pierre Robillard 1
2 EIFFEL2 - Cognition and Cooperation in Design
Inria Paris-Rocquencourt, CNAM - Conservatoire National des Arts et Métiers [CNAM]
Abstract : By contrast to design meetings, design evaluation meetings (DEMs) have generally been considered as situations in which, according to DEMs methodologies, design activities are quite marginal. In a study of DEMs in software development, i.e. in technical review meetings following a particular review methodology, we showed: (i) the occurrence of design activities as part of an argumentation process; (ii) the relative importance of cognitive synchronisation as a prerequisite for evaluation; (iii) the important role played in evaluation by argumentation that makes explicit the underlying design rationale (DR). On the basis of our results, we discuss the potential for using DR methodologies in this kind of meetings.
Type de document :
Article dans une revue
Design Studies, Elsevier, 2004, 25 (6), pp.625-655
Liste complète des métadonnées

https://hal.inria.fr/inria-00117060
Contributeur : Francoise Detienne <>
Soumis le : mercredi 31 janvier 2007 - 19:18:51
Dernière modification le : mardi 17 avril 2018 - 11:24:35
Document(s) archivé(s) le : mardi 21 septembre 2010 - 12:03:23

Fichier

DesignStudies2004.pdf
Fichiers produits par l'(les) auteur(s)

Identifiants

Collections

Citation

Patrick D'Astous, Françoise Détienne, Willemien Visser, Pierre Robillard. Changing our view on design evaluation meetings methodology: a study of software technical review meetings. Design Studies, Elsevier, 2004, 25 (6), pp.625-655. 〈inria-00117060v2〉

Partager

Métriques

Consultations de la notice

227

Téléchargements de fichiers

144