Quantitative Measurements of the Influence of Participant Roles during Peer Review Meetings

Patrick D'Astous 1 Pierre Robillard 1 Françoise Détienne 2 Willemien Visser 2
2 EIFFEL2 - Cognition and Cooperation in Design
Inria Paris-Rocquencourt, CNAM - Conservatoire National des Arts et Métiers [CNAM]
Abstract : Peer review meetings (PRMs) are formal meetings during which peers systematically analyze artifacts to improve their quality and report on non-conformities. This paper presents an approach based on protocol analysis for quantifying the influence of participant roles during PRMs. Three views are used to characterize the seven defined participant roles. The project view defines three roles supervisor, procedure expert and developer. The meeting view defines two roles: author and reviewer, and the task view defines the roles reflecting direct and indirect interest in the artifact under review. The analysis, based on log-linear modeling, shows that review activities have different patterns, depending on their focus: form or content. The influence of each role is analyzed with respect to this focus. Interpretation of the quantitative data leads to the suggestion that PRMs could be improved by creating three different types of reviews, each of which collects together specific roles: form review, cognitive synchronization review and content review.
Type de document :
Article dans une revue
Empirical Software Engineering, Springer Verlag, 2001, 6, pp.143-159
Liste complète des métadonnées

Littérature citée [14 références]  Voir  Masquer  Télécharger

https://hal.inria.fr/inria-00117298
Contributeur : Francoise Detienne <>
Soumis le : vendredi 2 mars 2007 - 14:42:11
Dernière modification le : jeudi 13 septembre 2018 - 15:24:05
Document(s) archivé(s) le : mardi 21 septembre 2010 - 12:11:17

Fichier

EMSE2001.pdf
Fichiers produits par l'(les) auteur(s)

Identifiants

Collections

Citation

Patrick D'Astous, Pierre Robillard, Françoise Détienne, Willemien Visser. Quantitative Measurements of the Influence of Participant Roles during Peer Review Meetings. Empirical Software Engineering, Springer Verlag, 2001, 6, pp.143-159. 〈inria-00117298v2〉

Partager

Métriques

Consultations de la notice

190

Téléchargements de fichiers

98