Confrontation of viewpoints in a concurrent engineering process

Géraldine Martin 1 Françoise Détienne 2 Elisabeth Lavigne 1
2 EIFFEL2 - Cognition and Cooperation in Design
Inria Paris-Rocquencourt, CNAM - Conservatoire National des Arts et Métiers [CNAM]
Abstract : We present an empirical study aimed at analysing the use of viewpoints in an industrial Concurrent Engineering context. Our focus is on the viewpoints expressed in the argumentative process taking place in evaluation meetings. Our results show that arguments enabling a viewpoint or proposal to be defended are often characterized by the use of constraints. One result involved the way in which the proposals for solutions are assessed during these meetings. We have revealed the existence of specific assessment modes in these meetings as well as their combination. Then, we show that, even if some constraints are apparently identically used by the different specialists involved in meetings, various meanings and weightings are associated with these constraints by these different specialists.
Type de document :
Chapitre d'ouvrage
P. Chedmail. Integrated design and manufacturing in mechanical engineering, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2002
Liste complète des métadonnées

Littérature citée [11 références]  Voir  Masquer  Télécharger

https://hal.inria.fr/inria-00118159
Contributeur : Francoise Detienne <>
Soumis le : vendredi 2 mars 2007 - 12:49:04
Dernière modification le : vendredi 25 mai 2018 - 12:02:03
Document(s) archivé(s) le : mardi 21 septembre 2010 - 12:57:38

Fichier

IDMME-Chapter2002.pdf
Fichiers produits par l'(les) auteur(s)

Identifiants

Collections

Citation

Géraldine Martin, Françoise Détienne, Elisabeth Lavigne. Confrontation of viewpoints in a concurrent engineering process. P. Chedmail. Integrated design and manufacturing in mechanical engineering, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2002. 〈inria-00118159v2〉

Partager

Métriques

Consultations de la notice

107

Téléchargements de fichiers

74