HAL will be down for maintenance from Friday, June 10 at 4pm through Monday, June 13 at 9am. More information
Skip to Main content Skip to Navigation
Book sections

Confrontation of viewpoints in a concurrent engineering process

Géraldine Martin 1 Françoise Détienne 2 Elisabeth Lavigne 1
2 EIFFEL2 - Cognition and Cooperation in Design
Inria Paris-Rocquencourt, CNAM - Conservatoire National des Arts et Métiers [CNAM]
Abstract : We present an empirical study aimed at analysing the use of viewpoints in an industrial Concurrent Engineering context. Our focus is on the viewpoints expressed in the argumentative process taking place in evaluation meetings. Our results show that arguments enabling a viewpoint or proposal to be defended are often characterized by the use of constraints. One result involved the way in which the proposals for solutions are assessed during these meetings. We have revealed the existence of specific assessment modes in these meetings as well as their combination. Then, we show that, even if some constraints are apparently identically used by the different specialists involved in meetings, various meanings and weightings are associated with these constraints by these different specialists.
Document type :
Book sections
Complete list of metadata

Cited literature [11 references]  Display  Hide  Download

Contributor : Françoise Détienne Connect in order to contact the contributor
Submitted on : Friday, March 2, 2007 - 12:49:04 PM
Last modification on : Monday, February 21, 2022 - 3:38:06 PM
Long-term archiving on: : Tuesday, September 21, 2010 - 12:57:38 PM


Files produced by the author(s)




Géraldine Martin, Françoise Détienne, Elisabeth Lavigne. Confrontation of viewpoints in a concurrent engineering process. P. Chedmail. Integrated design and manufacturing in mechanical engineering, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2002. ⟨inria-00118159v2⟩



Record views


Files downloads