Skip to Main content Skip to Navigation
Book sections

Confrontation of viewpoints in a concurrent engineering process

Géraldine Martin 1 Françoise Détienne 2 Elisabeth Lavigne 1
2 EIFFEL2 - Cognition and Cooperation in Design
Inria Paris-Rocquencourt, CNAM - Conservatoire National des Arts et Métiers [CNAM]
Abstract : We present an empirical study aimed at analysing the use of viewpoints in an industrial Concurrent Engineering context. Our focus is on the viewpoints expressed in the argumentative process taking place in evaluation meetings. Our results show that arguments enabling a viewpoint or proposal to be defended are often characterized by the use of constraints. One result involved the way in which the proposals for solutions are assessed during these meetings. We have revealed the existence of specific assessment modes in these meetings as well as their combination. Then, we show that, even if some constraints are apparently identically used by the different specialists involved in meetings, various meanings and weightings are associated with these constraints by these different specialists.
Document type :
Book sections
Complete list of metadata

Cited literature [11 references]  Display  Hide  Download

https://hal.inria.fr/inria-00118159
Contributor : Françoise Détienne <>
Submitted on : Friday, March 2, 2007 - 12:49:04 PM
Last modification on : Thursday, September 3, 2020 - 1:32:03 PM
Long-term archiving on: : Tuesday, September 21, 2010 - 12:57:38 PM

File

IDMME-Chapter2002.pdf
Files produced by the author(s)

Identifiers

Collections

Citation

Géraldine Martin, Françoise Détienne, Elisabeth Lavigne. Confrontation of viewpoints in a concurrent engineering process. P. Chedmail. Integrated design and manufacturing in mechanical engineering, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2002. ⟨inria-00118159v2⟩

Share

Metrics

Record views

172

Files downloads

428