Minimum information requirements : neither bandits in the Attic nor bats in the belfry

David James Sherman 1, 2, *
* Auteur correspondant
1 MAGNOME - Models and Algorithms for the Genome
Inria Bordeaux - Sud-Ouest, UB - Université de Bordeaux, CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique : UMR5800
Abstract : In respose to de Marco and colleagues 'Minimum Information for Protein Functional Evaluation,' I observe that they run the risk of imposing a Procrustean solution to the problem of rigorously reporting experimental results involving recombinant proteins. While they rightly identify a need for experimental reporting standards defined by their scientific community, they wrongly assign this role to 'Minimum information' guidelines. In my response I clarify the role and development processes of minimum information standards, and relate a similar experience that we had in the ProteomeBinders Consortium, that led to a distinction between minimum information guidelines for describing a binder and its efficiency as a molecular tool, and the need to define community standards for experimental binder assessment.
Type de document :
Article dans une revue
New Biotechnology, Elsevier, 2009, 25 (4), pp.173-4. 〈10.1016/j.nbt.2008.12.002〉
Liste complète des métadonnées

https://hal.inria.fr/inria-00407505
Contributeur : David James Sherman <>
Soumis le : vendredi 24 juillet 2009 - 23:08:25
Dernière modification le : jeudi 11 janvier 2018 - 06:26:26

Identifiants

Citation

David James Sherman. Minimum information requirements : neither bandits in the Attic nor bats in the belfry. New Biotechnology, Elsevier, 2009, 25 (4), pp.173-4. 〈10.1016/j.nbt.2008.12.002〉. 〈inria-00407505〉

Partager

Métriques

Consultations de la notice

172