Skip to Main content Skip to Navigation
Journal articles

OpenMEEG: opensource software for quasistatic bioelectromagnetics

Alexandre Gramfort 1, 2 Théodore Papadopoulo 1 Emmanuel Olivi 1 Maureen Clerc 1, *
* Corresponding author
1 ATHENA - Computational Imaging of the Central Nervous System
CRISAM - Inria Sophia Antipolis - Méditerranée
2 PARIETAL - Modelling brain structure, function and variability based on high-field MRI data
Inria Saclay - Ile de France, NEUROSPIN - Service NEUROSPIN
Abstract : Background: Interpreting and controlling bioelectromagnetic phenomena require realistic physiological models and accurate numerical solvers. A semi-realistic model often used in practise is the piecewise constant conductivity model, for which only the interfaces have to be meshed. This simplified model makes it possible to use Boundary Element Methods. Unfortunately, most Boundary Element solutions are confronted with accuracy issues when the conductivity ratio between neighboring tissues is high, as for instance the scalp/skull conductivity ratio in electro-encephalography. To overcome this difficulty, we proposed a new method called the symmetric BEM, which is implemented in the OpenMEEG software. The aim of this paper is to present OpenMEEG, both from the theoretical and the practical point of view, and to compare its performances with other competing software packages. Methods: We have run a benchmark study in the field of electro- and magneto-encephalography, in order to compare the accuracy of OpenMEEG with other freely distributed forward solvers. We considered spherical models, for which analytical solutions exist, and we designed randomized meshes to assess the variability of the accuracy. Two measures were used to characterize the accuracy: the Relative Difference Measure and the Magnitude ratio. The comparisons were run, either with a constant number of mesh nodes, or a constant number of unknowns across methods. Computing times were also compared. Results: We observed more pronounced differences in accuracy in electroencephalography than in magnetoencephalography. The methods could be classified in three categories: the linear collocation methods, that run very fast but with low accuracy, the linear collocation methods with isolated skull approach for which the accuracy is improved, and OpenMEEG that clearly outperforms the others. As far as speed is concerned, OpenMEEG is on par with the other methods for a constant number of unknowns, and is hence faster for a prescribed accuracy level. Conclusions: This study clearly shows that OpenMEEG represents the state of the art for forward computations. Moreover, our software development strategies have made it handy to use and to integrate with other packages. The bioelectromagnetic research community should therefore be able to benefit from OpenMEEG with a limited development effort.
Complete list of metadata

Cited literature [29 references]  Display  Hide  Download
Contributor : Maureen Clerc Connect in order to contact the contributor
Submitted on : Thursday, May 27, 2010 - 10:30:27 PM
Last modification on : Monday, December 13, 2021 - 9:16:03 AM
Long-term archiving on: : Thursday, December 1, 2016 - 4:02:54 AM


Files produced by the author(s)




Alexandre Gramfort, Théodore Papadopoulo, Emmanuel Olivi, Maureen Clerc. OpenMEEG: opensource software for quasistatic bioelectromagnetics. BioMedical Engineering OnLine, BioMed Central, 2010, 9 (1), pp.45. ⟨10.1186/1475-925X-9-45⟩. ⟨inria-00467061v2⟩



Les métriques sont temporairement indisponibles