Of choices, failures and asynchrony: The many faces of set agreement, ISAAC 2009, LNCS # 5878, pp.943-953 ,
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00992777
Brief announcement: weakest failure detectors via an egg-laying simulation, pp.290-291, 2009. ,
Weakest failure detectors via an egg-laying simulation (preliminary version), Reports on Systems and Communications, issue.2, 2009. ,
Looking for the Weakest Failure Detector for k-Set Agreement in Message-Passing Systems: Is ${\it \Pi}_k$ the End of the Road?, SSS 2009, LNCS # 5873, pp.149-164 ,
DOI : 10.1007/978-3-642-05118-0_11
A simple proof of the necessity of the failure detector ?? to implement an atomic register in asynchronous message-passing systems, Information Processing Letters, vol.110, issue.4, pp.153-157, 2010. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.ipl.2009.11.011
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/inria-00543125
-resilient asynchronous computations, Proceedings of the twenty-fifth annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing , STOC '93, pp.91-100 ,
DOI : 10.1145/167088.167119
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00896459
The weakest failure detector for solving consensus, Journal of the ACM, vol.43, issue.4, pp.685-722, 1996. ,
DOI : 10.1145/234533.234549
Unreliable failure detectors for reliable distributed systems, Journal of the ACM, vol.43, issue.2, pp.225-267, 1996. ,
DOI : 10.1145/226643.226647
URL : http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.113.498
More Choices Allow More Faults: Set Consensus Problems in Totally Asynchronous Systems, Information and Computation, vol.105, issue.1, pp.132-158, 1993. ,
DOI : 10.1006/inco.1993.1043
Weakening Failure Detectors for k-Set Agreement Via the Partition Approach, DISC 2007, LNCS # 4731, pp.123-138 ,
DOI : 10.1007/978-3-540-75142-7_12
Sharing is harder than agreeing, Proceedings of the twenty-seventh ACM symposium on Principles of distributed computing, PODC '08, pp.85-94, 2008. ,
DOI : 10.1145/1400751.1400764
URL : http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.164.5273
The weakest failure detectors to solve certain fundamental problems in distributed computing, Proceedings of the twenty-third annual ACM symposium on Principles of distributed computing , PODC '04, pp.338-346, 2004. ,
DOI : 10.1145/1011767.1011818
The Weakest Failure Detector for Message Passing Set-Agreement, DISC 2008, LNCS # 5218, pp.109-120 ,
DOI : 10.1007/978-3-540-87779-0_8
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00260000
The disagreement power of an adversary, Proceedings of the 28th ACM symposium on Principles of distributed computing, PODC '09, pp.288-289, 2009. ,
DOI : 10.1145/1582716.1582769
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00376981
The inherent price of indulgence, Distributed Computing, pp.85-98, 2005. ,
Impossibility of distributed consensus with one faulty process, Journal of the ACM, vol.32, issue.2, pp.374-382, 1985. ,
DOI : 10.1145/3149.214121
The weakest failure detector for solving k-set agreement, Proceedings of the 28th ACM symposium on Principles of distributed computing, PODC '09, pp.83-91 ,
DOI : 10.1145/1582716.1582735
Indulgent algorithms (preliminary version), Proceedings of the nineteenth annual ACM symposium on Principles of distributed computing , PODC '00, pp.289-297, 2000. ,
DOI : 10.1145/343477.343630
URL : http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.583.6812
On the weakest failure detector ever, Distributed Computing, pp.353-366, 2009. ,
A general characterization of indulgence, Transactions on Autonomous and Adaptive Systems, vol.3, issue.4, 2008. ,
The Alpha of Indulgent Consensus, The Computer Journal, vol.50, issue.1, pp.53-67, 2007. ,
DOI : 10.1093/comjnl/bxl046
Reliable broadcast and related problems, pp.97-145, 1993. ,
Tight bounds for k-set agreement with limited-scope failure detectors, Distributed Computing, vol.29, issue.(5), pp.157-166, 2005. ,
DOI : 10.1007/s00446-005-0141-8
The topological structure of asynchronous computability, Journal of the ACM, vol.46, issue.6, pp.858-923, 1999. ,
DOI : 10.1145/331524.331529
On the computability power and the robustness of set agreement-oriented failure detector classes, Distributed Computing, pp.201-222, 2008. ,
DOI : 10.1007/s00446-008-0064-2
k-set agreement with limited accuracy failure detectors, Proceedings of the nineteenth annual ACM symposium on Principles of distributed computing , PODC '00, pp.143-152 ,
DOI : 10.1145/343477.343536
Failure detectors and the wait-free hierarchy, PODC 1995, pp.100-109 ,
In Search of the Holy Grail: Looking for the Weakest Failure Detector for Wait-Free Set Agreement, OPODIS 2006, LNCS # 4305, pp.3-19 ,
DOI : 10.1007/11945529_2
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/inria-00089977
-set agreement is impossible, Proceedings of the twenty-fifth annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing , STOC '93, pp.1449-1483, 2000. ,
DOI : 10.1145/167088.167122
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00192526
Structured derivations of consensus algorithms for failure detectors, Proceedings of the seventeenth annual ACM symposium on Principles of distributed computing , PODC '98, pp.297-306, 1998. ,
DOI : 10.1145/277697.277755
Anti-omega: the weakest failure detector for set agreement, PODC 2008, pp.55-64 ,