Skip to Main content Skip to Navigation
Conference papers

Showing Full Semantics Preservation in Model Transformation – A Comparison of Techniques

Abstract : Model transformation is a prime technique in modern, model-driven software design. One of the most challenging issues is to show that the semantics of the models is not affected by the transformation. So far, there is hardly any research into this issue, in particular in those cases where the source and target languages are different. In this paper, we are using two different state-of-the-art proof techniques (explicit bisimulation construction versus borrowed contexts) to show bisimilarity preservation of a given model transformation between two simple (self-defined) languages, both of which are equipped with a graph transformation-based operational semantics. The contrast between these proof techniques is interesting because they are based on different model transformation strategies: triple graph grammars versus in situ transformation. We proceed to compare the proofs and discuss scalability to a more realistic setting.
Complete list of metadata
Contributor : Ist Inria Nancy Grand Est Connect in order to contact the contributor
Submitted on : Monday, October 11, 2010 - 12:42:44 PM
Last modification on : Thursday, July 26, 2018 - 3:20:05 PM


  • HAL Id : inria-00525169, version 1



Mathias Hülsbusch, Barbara König, Arend Rensink, Maria Semenyak, Christian Soltenborn, et al.. Showing Full Semantics Preservation in Model Transformation – A Comparison of Techniques. Integrated Formal Methods - IFM 2010, INRIA Nancy Grand Est, Oct 2010, Nancy, France. pp.183-198. ⟨inria-00525169⟩



Record views