S. Comparison and . Syntactically, This suggests that SPARQL- DL [SP07] could be used instead of SPARQL to translate from the LISQL syntax. However, this is not possible because SPARQL-DL is restricted to conjunctive queries, and variables cannot occur in complex classes. On one hand, a LISQL query that contains disjunctions and negations but no variables (hence no cycles) and the default focus, can be translated to a SPARQL-DL query in the form Type(?x,C), where C is a complex class that has the same abstract syntax as the LISQL query. For example, the LISQL query a man and birth : (year : (1601 or 1649) and place : not in England) can be translated to Type, \{1649\})), some(place, not(some(in, \{England\}))) )))), p.1601

A. Bernstein, E. Kaufmann, and C. Kaiser, Querying the semantic web with Ginseng: A guided input natural language search engine, Work. Information Technology and Systems (WITS), 2005.

]. J. Bro96 and . Brooke, SUS: A quick and dirty usability scale, Usability evaluation in industry, pp.189-194, 1996.

]. S. Fer09 and . Ferré, Camelis: a logical information system to organize and browse a collection of documents, Int. J. General Systems, vol.38, issue.4, 2009.

R. Fikes, P. J. Hayes, and I. Horrocks, OWL-QL???a language for deductive query answering on the Semantic Web, Web Semantics: Science, Services and Agents on the World Wide Web, vol.2, issue.1, pp.19-29, 2004.
DOI : 10.1016/j.websem.2004.07.002

O. [. Ferré and . Ridoux, A File System Based on Concept Analysis, Int. Conf. Rules and Objects in Databases, pp.1033-1047, 2000.
DOI : 10.1007/3-540-44957-4_69

O. [. Ferré and . Ridoux, Introduction to logical information systems, Information Processing & Management, vol.40, issue.3, pp.383-419, 2004.
DOI : 10.1016/S0306-4573(03)00018-9

O. [. Ferré and . Ridoux, Logical Information Systems: from Taxonomies to Logics, 18th International Conference on Database and Expert Systems Applications (DEXA 2007), pp.212-216, 2007.
DOI : 10.1109/DEXA.2007.47

R. [. Ganter and . Wille, Formal Concept Analysis ? Mathematical Foundations, 1999.

J. [. Haase, A. Broekstra, R. Eberhart, and . Volz, A Comparison of RDF Query Languages, Int. Semantic Web Conf, pp.502-517, 2004.
DOI : 10.1007/978-3-540-30475-3_35

M. Hearst, A. Elliott, J. English, R. Sinha, K. Swearingen et al., Finding the flow in web site search, Communications of the ACM, vol.45, issue.9, pp.42-49, 2002.
DOI : 10.1145/567498.567525

P. Hitzler, M. Krötzsch, and S. Rudolph, Foundations of Semantic Web Technologies, 2009.

M. Hildebrand, J. Van-ossenbruggen, L. Hardmanmar06-]-g, and . Marchionini, /facet: A browser for heterogeneous semantic web repositories Exploratory search: from finding to understanding, Communications of the ACM, vol.49, issue.4, pp.272-28541, 2006.

E. Mäkelä, E. Hyvönen, and S. Saarela, Ontogator -a semantic view-based search engine service for web applications, Int. Semantic Web Conf., LNCS 4273, pp.847-860, 2006.

E. Oren, R. Delbru, and S. Decker, Extending Faceted Navigation for RDF Data, LNCS, vol.4273, pp.559-572, 2006.
DOI : 10.1007/11926078_40
URL : http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.98.9915

J. Pérez, M. Arenas, and C. Gutierrez, nSPARQL: A navigational language for RDF, LNCS, vol.5318, pp.66-81, 2008.

]. G. Sac00 and . Sacco, Dynamic taxonomies: A model for large information bases, IEEE Transactions Knowledge and Data Engineering, vol.12, issue.3, pp.468-479, 2000.

]. G. Sac06 and . Sacco, Some research results in dynamic taxonomy and faceted search systems, Faceted Search Work. at ACM SIGIR, 2006.

B. [. Sirin and . Parsia, SPARQL-DL: SPARQL query for OWL-DL, Work. OWL Experiences and Directions (OWLED), 2007.

Y. [. Sacco and . Tzitzikas, Dynamic taxonomies and faceted search. The information retrieval series, 2009.

K. [. Suominen, E. Viljanen, and . Hyvönen, User-centric faceted search for semantic portals A new theoretical framework for information retrieval, Semantic Web Conf. Int. ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, pp.356-370, 1986.