How our beliefs contribute to interpret actions

Abstract : In update logic the interpretation of an action is often assumed to be independent from the agents' beliefs about the situation (see [BMS04] or [Auc05]). In this paper we deal with this type of phe- nomenon. We also deal with actions that change facts of the situation. We use probability to model the notion of belief and our probabilistic update mechanism satisfies the AGM postulates of belief revision.
Document type :
Conference papers
Complete list of metadatas

Cited literature [10 references]  Display  Hide  Download

https://hal.inria.fr/inria-00556095
Contributor : Guillaume Aucher <>
Submitted on : Sunday, September 8, 2013 - 7:27:21 PM
Last modification on : Friday, October 11, 2019 - 8:22:48 PM
Long-term archiving on : Monday, December 9, 2013 - 4:23:11 AM

File

10.1007-11559221_28.pdf
Publisher files allowed on an open archive

Identifiers

  • HAL Id : inria-00556095, version 2

Collections

Citation

Guillaume Aucher. How our beliefs contribute to interpret actions. CEEMAS - Central and Eastern European Conference on Multi-Agent Systems - 2005, Sep 2005, Budapest, Hungary. ⟨inria-00556095v2⟩

Share

Metrics

Record views

158

Files downloads

936