O. Un, Object Relational Mapper) est utilisé Il automatise le mapping entre les instances des classes JAVA manipulées et leur représentation en base de données. L'ORM est ici Hibernate, une librairie JAVA qui est capable de générer le SQL pour manipuler les jeux de données, les jobs

R. Go-de, CPU: 8 x 2.73 GHz, OS: Linux -Centos 6)

P. Bui, L. Yu, and D. Thain, Weaver, Proceedings of the 19th ACM International Symposium on High Performance Distributed Computing, HPDC '10, pp.636-643, 2010.
DOI : 10.1145/1851476.1851570

A. Darling, L. Carey, and W. Feng, The design, implementation, and evaluation of mpiBLAST, Proceedings of ClusterWorld Conference, pp.13-15, 2003.

J. Eder, W. Gruber, and H. Pichler, Transforming Workflow Graphs, Proceedings of the first international conference on interoperability of enterprise software and applications INTEROP-ESA 2005, pp.203-215, 2005.
DOI : 10.1007/1-84628-152-0_19

Z. Farkas and P. Kacsuk, P-GRADE Portal: A generic workflow system to support user communities, Future Generation Computer Systems, vol.27, issue.5, pp.454-465, 2011.
DOI : 10.1016/j.future.2010.12.001

J. Goecks, A. Nekrutenko, J. Taylor, and T. Team, Galaxy: a comprehensive approach for supporting accessible, reproducible, and transparent computational research in the life sciences, Genome Biology, vol.11, issue.8, p.1186, 2010.
DOI : 10.1186/gb-2010-11-8-r86

J. Ison, M. Kalas, I. Jonassen, D. Bolser, M. Uludag et al., EDAM: an ontology of bioinformatics operations, types of data and identifiers, topics and formats, Bioinformatics, vol.29, issue.10, pp.291325-291357, 2013.
DOI : 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt113

L. Jourdren, M. Bernard, M. Dillies, and S. L. Crom, Eoulsan: a cloud computing-based framework facilitating high throughput sequencing analyses, Bioinformatics, vol.28, issue.11, pp.281542-281545, 2012.
DOI : 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts165

S. Krishnan, B. Stearn, K. Bhatia, K. Baldridge, W. Li et al., Opal: SimpleWeb Services Wrappers for Scientific Applications, 2006 IEEE International Conference on Web Services (ICWS'06), pp.823-832, 2006.
DOI : 10.1109/ICWS.2006.96

O. Labbani, J. Luc-dekeyser, P. Boulet, and E. Rutten, Introducing control in the gaspard2 data-parallel metamodel: Synchronous approach, Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Modeling and Analysis of Real-Time and Embedded Systems, 2005.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/inria-00000911

A. Lamprecht, S. Naujokat, B. Steffen, and T. Margaria, Constraint-Guided Workflow Composition Based on the EDAM Ontology, Proceedings of the Workshop on Semantic Web Applications and Tools for Life Sciences, 2010.
DOI : 10.1038/npre.2010.5397.1

E. Lee and D. Messerschmitt, Static Scheduling of Synchronous Data Flow Programs for Digital Signal Processing, IEEE Transactions on Computers, vol.36, issue.1, 1987.
DOI : 10.1109/TC.1987.5009446

W. Li, S. Krishnan, K. Mueller, K. Ichikawa, S. Date et al., Building cyberinfrastructure for bioinformatics using service oriented architecture, Sixth IEEE International Symposium on Cluster Computing and the Grid (CCGRID'06), pp.8-39, 2006.
DOI : 10.1109/CCGRID.2006.1630932

C. Lin, S. Lu, X. Fei, D. Pai, and J. Hua, A Task Abstraction and Mapping Approach to the Shimming Problem in Scientific Workflows, 2009 IEEE International Conference on Services Computing, pp.284-291, 2009.
DOI : 10.1109/SCC.2009.77

B. Ludäscher, I. Altintas, C. Berkley, D. Higgins, E. Jaeger et al., Scientific workflow management and the Kepler system, Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience, pp.1039-1065, 2006.
DOI : 10.1002/cpe.994

T. Oinn, M. Greenwood, M. Addis, M. N. Alpdemir, J. Ferris et al., Taverna: lessons in creating a workflow environment for the life sciences, Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience, pp.181067-1100, 2006.
DOI : 10.1002/cpe.993

A. Glossaire, Autonomous Semi-Concrete DataFlow Model API: Interface de programmation (Application Programming Interface

G. Bibliographie, M. , and A. Christophe, Opening Galaxy to script execution by everyone, Galaxy Community Conference 2015, 2015.

R. Eric, G. Bjorn, C. John, and B. Dannon, Galaxy Interactive Environments ? a new way to interact with your data, Galaxy Community Conference 2015, 2015.

M. Airaj, C. Blanchet, S. Kenny, and C. Loomis, Appliance Management for Federated Cloud Environments, 2013 IEEE 5th International Conference on Cloud Computing Technology and Science, pp.232-239, 2013.
DOI : 10.1109/CloudCom.2013.38

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00865156

C. Goble and D. D. Roure, myExperiment, Proceedings of the 2nd workshop on Workflows in support of large-scale science, WORKS '07, pp.1-2, 2007.
DOI : 10.1145/1273360.1273361

S. Edwards, L. Lavagno, E. A. Lee, and A. Sangiovanni-vincentelli, Design of embedded systems: formal models, validation, and synthesis, Proceedings of the IEEE, pp.366-390, 1997.

F. Puhlmann and M. Weske, Using the ??-Calculus for Formalizing Workflow Patterns, Business Process Management, 2005.
DOI : 10.1007/11538394_11

E. Ogasawara, J. Dias, and D. Oliveira, An algebraic approach for data-centric scientific workflows, Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment (PVLDB), pp.1328-1339, 2011.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00640431

E. Ogasawara, D. Jonas, V. Silva, C. Fernando, O. Daniel-de et al., Chiron: a parallel engine for algebraic scientific workflows, Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience, pp.2327-2341, 2013.
DOI : 10.1002/cpe.3032

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/lirmm-00806557

C. Olston, B. Reed, and U. Srivastava, Pig latin, Proceedings of the 2008 ACM SIGMOD international conference on Management of data , SIGMOD '08, pp.1099-1110, 2008.
DOI : 10.1145/1376616.1376726

J. Dean and S. Ghemawat, MapReduce, Communications of the ACM, vol.51, issue.1, pp.1-13, 2008.
DOI : 10.1145/1327452.1327492

A. Schumacher, L. Pireddu, M. Niemenmaa, A. Kallio, E. Korpelainen et al., SeqPig: simple and scalable scripting for large sequencing data sets in Hadoop, Bioinformatics, vol.30, issue.1, p.186, 2013.
DOI : 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt601

L. Lin, V. Lychagina, W. Liu, Y. Kwon, S. Mittal et al., Tenzing a sql implementation on the mapreduce framework, Proceedings of VLDB, pp.1318-1327, 2011.

R. S. Xin, J. Rosen, M. Zaharia, M. J. Franklin, S. Shenker et al., Shark, Proceedings of the 2013 international conference on Management of data, SIGMOD '13, pp.13-24, 2013.
DOI : 10.1145/2463676.2465288

A. Thusoo, J. S. Sarma, N. Jain, Z. Shao, P. Chakka et al., Hive - a petabyte scale data warehouse using Hadoop, 2010 IEEE 26th International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE 2010), pp.996-1005, 2010.
DOI : 10.1109/ICDE.2010.5447738

M. Armbrust, R. S. Xin, C. Lian, Y. Huai, D. Liu et al., Spark SQL, Proceedings of the 2015 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data, SIGMOD '15, 2015.
DOI : 10.1145/2723372.2742797

M. Zaharia, M. Chowdhury, M. J. Franklin, S. Shenker, and I. Stoica, Spark: cluster computing with working sets, Proceedings of the 2nd USENIX conference on Hot topics in cloud computing, p.10, 2010.

M. Wiewiórka and A. Messina, SparkSeq: fast, scalable and cloud-ready tool for the interactive genomic data analysis with nucleotide precision, Bioinformatics, vol.30, issue.18, pp.1-3, 2014.
DOI : 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu343

W. Van-der-aalst, THE APPLICATION OF PETRI NETS TO WORKFLOW MANAGEMENT, Journal of Circuits, Systems and Computers, vol.08, issue.01, 1998.
DOI : 10.1142/S0218126698000043

W. V. Der-aalst and A. T. Hofstede, YAWL: yet another workflow language Information systems, 2005.

G. Kahn, The semantics of a simple language for parallel programming, pp.471-475, 1974.

S. Ha and H. Oh, Decidable Dataflow Models for Signal Processing: Synchronous Dataflow and Its Extensions, Handbook of Signal Processing Systems, pp.1083-1109, 2013.
DOI : 10.1007/978-1-4614-6859-2_33

. Barros, Workflow patterns, Distrib. Parallel Databases, pp.5-51, 2003.

B. Kiepusewski, Expressiveness and suitability of languages for control ow modelling in workows, 2003.

J. Bertin, Semiology of graphics, 1983.

S. K. Card and J. Mackinlay, The structure of the information visualization design space, Proceedings of VIZ '97: Visualization Conference, Information Visualization Symposium and Parallel Rendering Symposium, pp.92-99, 1997.
DOI : 10.1109/INFVIS.1997.636792

A. Maclean, K. Carter, L. Lövstrand, and T. Moran, User-tailorable systems: pressing the issues with buttons, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems Empowering people, CHI '90, pp.175-182, 1990.
DOI : 10.1145/97243.97271

H. Lieberman, F. Paternò, M. Klann, and V. Wulf, End-User Development: An Emerging Paradigm, pp.1-8, 2006.
DOI : 10.1007/1-4020-5386-X_1

M. L. Dertouzos, Creating the people's computer, Technology Review, vol.100, pp.20-28, 1997.

E. Lee and D. Messerschmitt, Static Scheduling of Synchronous Data Flow Programs for Digital Signal Processing, IEEE Transactions on Computers, vol.36, issue.1, 1987.
DOI : 10.1109/TC.1987.5009446

G. Bilsen, M. Engels, R. Lauwereins, and J. A. Peperstraete, Cyclo-static data flow, 1995 International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, pp.3255-3258, 1995.
DOI : 10.1109/ICASSP.1995.479579

J. Buck and E. Lee, The Token Flow Model Advanced Topics in Dataflow Computing and Multithreading, 1995.

J. Piat, R. M. Bhattacharyya, and S. S. , Interface-based hierarchy for synchronous data-flow graphs, 2009 IEEE Workshop on Signal Processing Systems, pp.145-150, 2009.
DOI : 10.1109/SIPS.2009.5336240

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00440478

S. S. Bhattacharyya, E. F. Deprettere, and B. D. , Theelen, dynamic dataow graphs, 2013.

G. Gao, R. Govindarajan, and P. Panangaden, Well-behaved dataflow programs for DSP computation, [Proceedings] ICASSP-92: 1992 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, pp.561-564, 1992.
DOI : 10.1109/ICASSP.1992.226558

S. Bhattacharyya, E. Deprettere, and J. Keinert, Dynamic and Multidimensional Dataflow Graphs, Handbook of Signal Processing Systems, pp.899-930, 2010.
DOI : 10.1007/978-1-4419-6345-1_32

A. Girault, B. Lee, and E. Lee, Hierarchical finite state machines with multiple concurrency models Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems, IEEE Transactions on, vol.18, pp.742-760, 1999.

K. Strehl, L. Thiele, M. Gries, D. Ziegenbein, R. Ernst et al., Funstate-an internal design representation for codesign Very Large Scale Integration (VLSI) Systems, IEEE Transactions on, vol.9, pp.524-544, 2001.

J. Boutellier, C. Lucarz, S. Lafond, V. M. Gomez, and M. Mattavelli, Quasi-Static Scheduling of CAL Actor Networks for Reconfigurable Video Coding, Journal of Signal Processing Systems, vol.75, issue.9, pp.191-202, 2011.
DOI : 10.1007/s11265-009-0389-5

W. M. Johnston, J. R. Hanna, and R. J. Millar, Advances in dataflow programming languages, ACM Computing Surveys, vol.36, issue.1, pp.1-34, 2004.
DOI : 10.1145/1013208.1013209

M. Auguston and A. Delgado, Iterative constructs in the visual data flow language, Visual Languages Proceedings. 1997 IEEE Symposium on, pp.152-159, 1997.

H. Andrade and S. Kovner, Software synthesis from dataflow models for G and LabVIEW/sup TM/, Conference Record of Thirty-Second Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers (Cat. No.98CH36284), pp.1706-1709, 1998.
DOI : 10.1109/ACSSC.1998.751616

E. Baroth and C. Hartsough, Visual programming in the real world, pp.21-42, 1995.

H. Reekie, Realtime signal processing : dataow, visual, and functional programming, 1995.

L. Simoncini, Functional paradigm for designing dependable large-scale parallel computing systems, Proceedings ISAD 93: International Symposium on Autonomous Decentralized Systems, pp.108-114, 1993.

R. Ebner and A. Pfaffinger, Transformation of functional programs into data flow graphs implemented with PVM, Parallel Virtual Machine -EuroPVM'96, Third European PVM Conference, pp.251-258, 1996.
DOI : 10.1007/3540617795_32

H. Vandierendonck, A Unified Scheduler for Recursive and Task Dataflow Parallelism, 2011 International Conference on Parallel Architectures and Compilation Techniques, pp.1-11, 2011.
DOI : 10.1109/PACT.2011.7

L. Bic, A process-oriented model for efficient execution of dataflow programs, Journal of Parallel and Distributed Computing, vol.8, issue.1, 1990.
DOI : 10.1016/0743-7315(90)90067-Y

F. Yazdanpanah, Analysis of the Task Superscalar Architecture Hardware Design, Procedia Computer Science, vol.18, 2014.
DOI : 10.1016/j.procs.2013.05.197

T. Gruber, A translation approach to portable ontology specifications Knowledge acquisition, 1993.

U. Aß-mann, S. Zschaler, and G. Wagner, Ontologies, meta-models, and the model-driven paradigm, Ontologies For Software Engineering And Software Technology, pp.249-272, 2006.

M. Object and . Group, Ontology definition metamodel (omg) version 1.0, 2009.

A. Lamprecht, T. Margaria, and B. Steffen, Bio-jETI: a framework for semantics-based service composition, BMC Bioinformatics, vol.10, issue.Suppl 10, p.8, 2009.
DOI : 10.1186/1471-2105-10-S10-S8

Y. Gil, Mapping Semantic Workflows to Alternative Workflow Execution Engines, 2013 IEEE Seventh International Conference on Semantic Computing, pp.377-382, 2013.
DOI : 10.1109/ICSC.2013.70

S. Zivkovi?, M. Murzek, and H. Kühn, Bringing Ontology Awareness into Model Driven Engineering Platforms1, CEUR Workshop Proceedings, pp.47-54, 2008.

D. Wagelaar and R. Van-der-straeten, Platform ontologies for the model-driven architecture, European Journal of Information Systems, vol.34, issue.11, pp.362-373, 2007.
DOI : 10.1007/11787044_25

D. Hollingsworth, the workflow reference model, 1995.

V. Curcin and M. Ghanem, Scientific workflow systems - can one size fit all?, 2008 Cairo International Biomedical Engineering Conference, pp.1-9, 2008.
DOI : 10.1109/CIBEC.2008.4786077

J. Yu and R. Buyya, A Taxonomy of Workflow Management Systems for Grid Computing, Journal of Grid Computing, vol.15, issue.5???6, pp.3-4, 2005.
DOI : 10.1007/s10723-005-9010-8

V. Korkhov, D. Krefting, J. Montagnat, T. Truong-huu, T. Kukla et al., SHIWA workflow interoperability solutions for neuroimaging data analysis, Stud Health Technol Inform, vol.175, 2012.

B. Néron, H. Ménager, C. Maufrais, N. Joly, J. Maupetit et al., Mobyle: a new full web bioinformatics framework, Bioinformatics, vol.25, issue.22, pp.3005-3011, 2009.
DOI : 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp493

J. Goecks, A. Nekrutenko, J. Taylor, and T. Team, Galaxy: a comprehensive approach for supporting accessible, reproducible, and transparent computational research in the life sciences, Genome Biology, vol.11, issue.8, p.86, 2010.
DOI : 10.1186/gb-2010-11-8-r86

T. Oinn, M. Greenwood, M. Addis, M. N. Alpdemir, J. Ferris et al., Taverna: lessons in creating a workflow environment for the life sciences, Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience, pp.1067-1100, 2006.
DOI : 10.1002/cpe.993

B. Ludäscher, I. Altintas, C. Berkley, D. Higgins, E. Jaeger et al., Scientific workflow management and the Kepler system, Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience, pp.1039-1065, 2006.
DOI : 10.1002/cpe.994

E. Deelman, G. Singh, M. Su, J. Blythe, Y. Gil et al., Pegasus: A Framework for Mapping Complex Scientific Workflows onto Distributed Systems, Scientic Programming, 2005.
DOI : 10.1155/2005/128026

Y. Zhao, M. Hategan, B. Clifford, I. Foster, G. Von-laszewski et al., Swift: Fast, Reliable, Loosely Coupled Parallel Computation, 2007 IEEE Congress on Services (Services 2007), pp.199-206, 2007.
DOI : 10.1109/SERVICES.2007.63

M. R. Berthold, N. Cebron, F. Dill, G. D. Fatta, T. R. Gabriel et al., Knime: The konstanz information miner, " in in proceedings of the workshop on multi-agent systems and simulation mass, pp.58-61, 2006.

Y. , G. Gil, V. Ratnakar, E. Deelman, G. Mehta et al., Intelligent workflow systems and provenance-aware software Wings for pegasus: Creating large-scale scientific applications using semantic representations of computational workflows, Proceedings of the Seventh International Congress on Environmental Modeling and Software Proceedings of the Twenty-Second National Conference on Articial Intelligence (AAAI), pp.1767-1774, 2007.

T. Glatard, J. Montagnat, D. Lingrand, and X. Pennec, Flexible and Efficient Workflow Deployment of Data-Intensive Applications On Grids With MOTEUR, International Journal of High Performance Computing Applications, vol.22, issue.3, pp.347-360, 2008.
DOI : 10.1177/1094342008096067

J. Liu, E. Pacitti, P. Valduriez, and M. Mattoso, A Survey of Data-Intensive Scientific Workflow Management, Journal of Grid Computing, vol.1, issue.Webserver-Issue, pp.1-37, 2015.
DOI : 10.1007/s10723-015-9329-8

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/lirmm-01144760

M. Bux and U. Leser, Parallelization in scientific workflow management systems, 1303.

D. Hull, K. Wolstencroft, R. Stevens, C. Goble, M. R. Pocock et al., Taverna: a tool for building and running workflows of services, Nucleic Acids Research, vol.34, issue.Web Server, pp.729-732, 2006.
DOI : 10.1093/nar/gkl320

E. Kawas, M. Senger, and M. Wilkinson, BioMoby extensions to the Taverna workflow management and enactment software, BMC bioinformatics, 2006.

A. Shah, Z. Singhera, and S. Ahsan, Web Services for Bioinformatics, Bioinformatics: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications (Information Resources Management Association (USA) ch. 19, pp.345-363, 2011.

L. Cabral, J. Domingue, and E. Motta, Approaches to Semantic Web Services: an Overview and Comparisons, 1st European Semantic Web Symposium, pp.225-239, 2004.
DOI : 10.1007/978-3-540-25956-5_16

M. Wilkinson, H. Schoof, R. Ernst, and D. Haase, BioMOBY Successfully Integrates Distributed Heterogeneous Bioinformatics Web Services. The PlaNet Exemplar Case, PLANT PHYSIOLOGY, vol.138, issue.1, pp.5-17, 2005.
DOI : 10.1104/pp.104.059170

S. Krishnan, B. Stearn, K. Bhatia, K. Baldridge, W. Li et al., Opal: SimpleWeb Services Wrappers for Scientific Applications, 2006 IEEE International Conference on Web Services (ICWS'06), pp.823-832, 2006.
DOI : 10.1109/ICWS.2006.96

I. Taylor, M. Shields, I. Wang, and A. Harrison, The triana workflow environment: Architecture and applications Workows for e-Science, The Workflow System, pp.320-339, 2007.

S. Wernicke and K. Brubaker, The IGOR Cloud Platform: Collaborative, Scalable , and Peer-Reviewed NGS Data Analysis, Journal of Biomolecular Techniques: JBT, vol.24, 2013.

C. Sloggett, N. Goonasekera, and E. Afgan, BioBlend: automating pipeline analyses within Galaxy and CloudMan, Bioinformatics, vol.29, issue.13, pp.1685-1686, 2013.
DOI : 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt199

M. Kalas, P. Puntervoll, A. Joseph, E. Bartaseviciute, A. Töpfer et al., BioXSD: the common data-exchange format for everyday bioinformatics web services, Bioinformatics, vol.26, issue.18, pp.540-546, 2010.
DOI : 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq391

A. Kashlev, S. Lu, and A. Chebotko, Typetheoretic Approach to the Shimming Problem in Scientific Workflows, IEEE Transactions on Services Computing, vol.8, issue.5, pp.1-1, 2014.
DOI : 10.1109/TSC.2014.2347049

C. Lin, S. Lu, X. Fei, D. Pai, and J. Hua, A Task Abstraction and Mapping Approach to the Shimming Problem in Scientific Workflows, 2009 IEEE International Conference on Services Computing, pp.284-291, 2009.
DOI : 10.1109/SCC.2009.77

G. Mentzas and C. Halaris, Workflow on the Web: Integrating E-Commerce And Business Process Management, International Journal of E-Business Strategy Management, vol.1, issue.2, pp.147-157, 1999.

W. V. Der-aalst, Process mining: discovery, conformance and enhancement of business processes, 2011.

J. Estefan and K. Laskey, Reference architecture foundation for service oriented architecture version 1.0, Tech. Rep. December, OASIS Committee Specification, 2012.

D. Bovenzi, G. Canfora, and A. Fasolino, Enabling legacy system accessibility by Web heterogeneous clients, Seventh European Conference onSoftware Maintenance and Reengineering, 2003. Proceedings., pp.73-81, 2003.
DOI : 10.1109/CSMR.2003.1192412

E. Rasche, B. Gruning, J. Chilton, and D. Baker, Galaxy Interactive Environments ? a new way to interact with your data, Galaxy Community Conference 2015, 2015.

F. Pérez and B. E. Granger, IPython: A System for Interactive Scientific Computing, Computing in Science & Engineering, vol.9, issue.3, pp.21-29, 2007.
DOI : 10.1109/MCSE.2007.53

M. Maynard and G. Dimitoglou, A Service Oriented Architecture Complexity Metric, Based on Statistical Hypothesis Testing, Proceedings of the 2008 International Conference on Software Engineering Research {&} Practice, pp.214-220, 2008.

F. Hueske, M. Peters, M. J. Sax, R. Bergmann, A. Krettek et al., Opening the black boxes in data flow optimization, Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment (PVLDB), pp.1256-1267, 2012.
DOI : 10.14778/2350229.2350244

K. Eilbeck, S. E. Lewis, C. J. Mungall, M. Yandell, L. Stein et al., Sequence Ontology, Genome Biology, vol.6, issue.5, p.44, 2005.
DOI : 10.1007/978-1-4419-9863-7_1107

M. Ashburner, C. A. Ball, J. A. Blake, D. Botstein, H. Butler et al., Gene Ontology: tool for the unification of biology, Nature Genetics, vol.9, issue.1, pp.25-29, 2000.
DOI : 10.1038/75556

J. Ison, M. Kalas, I. Jonassen, D. Bolser, M. Uludag et al., EDAM: an ontology of bioinformatics operations, types of data and identifiers, topics and formats, Bioinformatics, vol.29, issue.10, pp.1325-1357, 2013.
DOI : 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt113

J. K. Bonfield and M. V. Mahoney, Compression of FASTQ and SAM Format Sequencing Data, PLoS ONE, vol.32, issue.3, p.59190, 2013.
DOI : 10.1371/journal.pone.0059190.s001

J. T. Dudley and A. J. Butte, In silico research in the era of cloud computing, Nature Biotechnology, vol.367, issue.11, pp.1181-1186, 2010.
DOI : 10.1101/gr.4086505

J. Riley, StarCluster -NumPy/SciPy Computing on Amazon's Elastic Compute Cloud (EC2), SciPY2010 : Python for Scientic Computing Conference, 2010.

E. Afgan, D. Baker, N. Coraor, B. Chapman, A. Nekrutenko et al., Galaxy CloudMan: delivering cloud compute clusters, S4, 2010. [103] Amazon Elastic Compute Cloud, pp.2015-2024, 2008.
DOI : 10.1186/1471-2105-11-S12-S4

D. Milojicic, I. M. Llorente, and R. S. Montero, OpenNebula: A Cloud Management Tool, IEEE Internet Computing, vol.15, issue.2, pp.11-14, 2011.
DOI : 10.1109/MIC.2011.44

E. Afgan, B. Chapman, M. Jadan, V. Franke, and J. Taylor, Using Cloud Computing Infrastructure with CloudBioLinux, CloudMan, and Galaxy, Current Protocols in Bioinformatics, vol.29, pp.11-20, 2012.
DOI : 10.1002/0471250953.bi1109s38

H. J. La, J. S. Her, and S. D. Kim, Framework for evaluating reusability of Component-as-a-Service (CaaS), 2013 5th International Workshop on Principles of Engineering Service-Oriented Systems (PESOS), pp.41-44, 2013.
DOI : 10.1109/PESOS.2013.6635976

M. Mohamed, D. Belaid, and S. Tata, Self-managed micro-containers for servicebased applications in the cloud, Enabling Technologies: Infrastructure for Collaborative Enterprises (WETICE), 2013 IEEE 22nd International Workshop on, pp.140-145, 2013.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00850180

M. E. Aranguren, Merging OpenLifeData with SADI services using Galaxy and Docker (DOI 10, BioRxiv, 2015.

P. Mell and T. Grance, The NIST definition of cloud computing, 2011.
DOI : 10.6028/NIST.SP.800-145

D. Blankenberg, G. V. Kuster, E. Bouvier, D. Baker, E. Afgan et al., Dissemination of scientific software with Galaxy ToolShed, Genome Biology, vol.15, issue.2, p.403, 2014.
DOI : 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr330

B. Ludäscher, I. Altintas, S. Bowers, J. Cummings, T. Critchlow et al., Scientific Process Automation and Workflow Management, Scientic Data Management: Challenges, Existing Technology , and Deployment, Computational Science Series, pp.476-508, 2009.
DOI : 10.1201/9781420069815-c13

M. J. Flynn, Some Computer Organizations and Their Effectiveness, IEEE Transactions on Computers, vol.21, issue.9, pp.948-960, 1972.
DOI : 10.1109/TC.1972.5009071

D. Sima, T. Fountain, and P. Kacsuk, Advanced computer architectures -a design space approach. a design space approach, 1997.

K. Maheshwari, A. Rodriguez, D. Kelly, R. Madduri, J. M. Wozniak et al., Enabling multi-task computation on Galaxy-based gateways using swift, 2013 IEEE International Conference on Cluster Computing (CLUSTER), pp.2013-2013
DOI : 10.1109/CLUSTER.2013.6702701

C. Sieb, T. Meinl, and M. R. Berthold, Parallel and Distributed Data Pipelining with KNIME, Mediterranean Journal of Computers and Networks ,Special Issue on Data Maining Applications on Supercomputing and Grid Environnments, vol.3, pp.43-51, 2007.

A. Lamprecht, S. Naujokat, B. Steffen, and T. Margaria, Constraint-Guided Workflow Composition Based on the EDAM Ontology, Proceedings of the Workshop on Semantic Web Applications and Tools for Life Sciences, 2010.
DOI : 10.1038/npre.2010.5397.1

O. Labbani, J. Luc-dekeyser, P. Boulet, and E. Rutten, Introducing control in the gaspard2 data-parallel metamodel: Synchronous approach, Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Modeling and Analysis of Real-Time and Embedded Systems, 2005.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/inria-00000911

J. Eder, W. Gruber, and H. Pichler, Transforming Workflow Graphs, Proceedings of the rst international conference on interoperability of enterprise software and applications INTEROP-ESA 2005, pp.203-215, 2005.
DOI : 10.1007/1-84628-152-0_19

J. Buck, S. Ha, E. Lee, and D. Messerschmitt, Ptolemy: A Framework for Simulating and Prototyping Heterogeneous Systems, 1994.
DOI : 10.1016/B978-155860702-6/50048-X

G. Borges, M. David, J. Gomes, C. Fernandez, J. Lopez-cacheiro et al., Sun Grid Engine, a new scheduler Bibliographie for EGEE middleware, IBERGRID -Iberian Grid Infrastructure Conference, 2007.

M. Dodt, J. T. Roehr, R. Ahmed, and C. Dieterich, FLEXBAR???Flexible Barcode and Adapter Processing for Next-Generation Sequencing Platforms, Biology, vol.1, issue.3, pp.895-905, 2012.
DOI : 10.3390/biology1030895

C. Belleannée, O. Sallou, and J. Nicolas, Logol: Expressive Pattern Matching in Sequences. Application to Ribosomal Frameshift Modeling, PRIB2014 -Pattern Recognition in Bioinformatics, 9th IAPR International Conference, pp.34-47, 2014.
DOI : 10.1007/978-3-319-09192-1_4

M. Clamp, D. Andrews, D. Barker, P. Bevan, G. Cameron et al., Ensembl 2002: accommodating comparative genomics, Ureta-Vidal, I. Vastrik, and E. Birney, pp.38-42, 2002.
DOI : 10.1093/nar/gkg083

F. Cunningham, M. R. Amode, D. Barrell, K. Beal, K. Billis et al., Ensembl 2015, Nucleic Acids Research, vol.43, issue.D1, pp.662-669, 2015.
DOI : 10.1093/nar/gku1010

R. Graham, G. Shipman, B. Barrett, R. Castain, G. Bosilca et al., Open MPI: A High-Performance, Heterogeneous MPI, 2006 IEEE International Conference on Cluster Computing, pp.1-9, 2006.
DOI : 10.1109/CLUSTR.2006.311904

T. and T. Huu, Workow-based applications performance and execution cost optimization on cloud infrastructures. Theses, 2010.

I. O. For-standardization and . Iso, Information Processing?Documentation Symbols for Data, Program and System Flowcharts, Program Network, Network Charts and System Resource Charts, 1985.

Y. Bertot, lambda-calcul et types, 2006.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/inria-00083975

M. Niemenmaa, A. Kallio, A. Schumacher, P. Klemelä, E. Korpelainen et al., Hadoop-BAM: directly manipulating next generation sequencing data in the cloud, Bioinformatics, vol.28, issue.6, pp.876-877, 2012.
DOI : 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts054

L. Jourdren, M. Bernard, M. Dillies, and S. L. Crom, Eoulsan: a cloud computing-based framework facilitating high throughput sequencing analyses, Bioinformatics, vol.28, issue.11, pp.1542-1545, 2012.
DOI : 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts165

P. Stevens, A Landscape of Bidirectional Model Transformations, Generative and transformational techniques in software engineering II, pp.408-424, 2008.
DOI : 10.1007/978-3-540-88643-3_10

U. Scholten, R. Fischer, and C. Zirpins, The dynamic network notation, Proceedings of the Fourth Annual Workshop on Simplifying Complex Networks for Practitioners, SIMPLEX '12, p.25, 2012.
DOI : 10.1145/2184356.2184363

U. Scholten, The dynamic network notation, Proceedings of the Fourth Annual Workshop on Simplifying Complex Networks for Practitioners, SIMPLEX '12, 2013.
DOI : 10.1145/2184356.2184363

A. Peter, T. Nebojsa, S. Stian, K. John, S. Luka et al., Beyond Galaxy: portable workflows and tool definitions with the CWL, Galaxy Community Conference 2015, 2015.

S. Naujokat, Synthesis-based loose programming, Quality of Information, pp.262-267, 2010.

F. Moreews and D. Lavenier, Seamless coarse grained parallelism integration in intensive bioinformatics workflows, Proceedings of the 20th European MPI Users' Group Meeting on, EuroMPI '13, pp.277-282, 2013.
DOI : 10.1145/2488551.2488588

URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00908842

J. Piat, F. Moreews, O. Collin, D. Lavenier, and A. Cornu, SLICEE: A Service oriented middleware for intensive scientific computation, 2011.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/inria-00638694

F. Moreews, O. Sallou, Y. Le-bras, G. Marie, C. Monjeaud et al., A curated Domain centric shared Docker registry linked to the Galaxy toolshed, Galaxy Community Conference 2015, 2015.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01160514

F. Moreews, J. Piat, and O. Sallou, OBIWEE : an open source bioinformatics cloud environment, BOSC 2011 -12th Annual Bioinformatics Open Source Conference, 2011.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/inria-00638715

F. Moreews, Y. Le-bras, O. Dameron, C. Monjeaud, and O. Collin, Integrating GALAXY workflows in a metadata management environment, Galaxy Community Conference, 0196.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01093058

B. Classification-des-workflows-en, 48 2.5 Classification des chaînes de traitements scientifiques suivant leur degré de formalisation, p.49

B. Un-port-de-sortie and C. , Propagation des valeurs NULL dans un acteur comportant deux ports d'entrée A, p.74