Skip to Main content Skip to Navigation
Conference papers

New Ways of Deliberating Online: An Empirical Comparison of Network and Threaded Interfaces for Online Discussion

Abstract : One of the Web’s most phenomenal impacts has been its capacity to connect and harness the ideas of many people seeking to tackle a problem. Social media appear to have played specific and significant roles in helping communities form and mobilize, even to the level of political uprisings. Nevertheless the online dialogue spaces we see on the Web today are often re-purposed social networks that offer no insight into the logical structure of the ideas, such as the coherence or evidential basis of an argument. This hampers both quality of citizen participation and effective assessment of the public debate. We report on an exploratory study in which we observed users interaction with a new tool for online deliberation and compared network and threaded visualizations of arguments. Results of the study suggest that network visualization of arguments can effectively improve online debate by facilitating higher-level inferences and making the debate more engaging and fun.
Complete list of metadatas

Cited literature [40 references]  Display  Hide  Download

https://hal.inria.fr/hal-01396957
Contributor : Hal Ifip <>
Submitted on : Tuesday, November 15, 2016 - 11:32:28 AM
Last modification on : Wednesday, November 16, 2016 - 1:04:10 AM
Long-term archiving on: : Thursday, March 16, 2017 - 6:42:40 PM

File

978-3-662-44914-1_8_Chapter.pd...
Files produced by the author(s)

Licence


Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

Identifiers

Citation

Anna Liddo, Simon Buckingham Shum. New Ways of Deliberating Online: An Empirical Comparison of Network and Threaded Interfaces for Online Discussion. 6th International Conference on Electronic Participation (ePart), Sep 2014, Dublin, Ireland. pp.90-101, ⟨10.1007/978-3-662-44914-1_8⟩. ⟨hal-01396957⟩

Share

Metrics

Record views

101

Files downloads

223