Skip to Main content Skip to Navigation
New interface
Preprints, Working Papers, ...

Design and Analysis of the NIPS 2016 Review Process

Abstract : Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS) is a top-tier annual conference in machine learning. The 2016 edition of the conference comprised more than 2,400 paper submissions, 3,000 reviewers, and 8,000 attendees, representing a growth of nearly 40% in terms of submissions, 96% in terms of reviewers, and over 100% in terms of attendees as compared to the previous year. In this report, we analyze several aspects of the data collected during the review process, including an experiment investigating the efficacy of collecting ordinal rankings from reviewers (vs. usual scores aka cardinal rankings). Our goal is to check the soundness of the review process we implemented and, in going so, provide insights that may be useful in the design of the review process of subsequent conferences. We introduce a number of metrics that could be used for monitoring improvements when new ideas are introduced.
Complete list of metadata
Contributor : Isabelle Guyon Connect in order to contact the contributor
Submitted on : Wednesday, December 20, 2017 - 8:09:20 AM
Last modification on : Friday, November 18, 2022 - 9:25:32 AM

Links full text


  • HAL Id : hal-01668377, version 1
  • ARXIV : 1708.09794


Nihar B. Shah, Behzad Tabibian, Krikamol Muandet, Isabelle Guyon, Ulrike von Luxburg. Design and Analysis of the NIPS 2016 Review Process. 2017. ⟨hal-01668377⟩



Record views