Combining Fuzzy Logic and Formal Argumentation for Legal Interpretation

Abstract : The interpretation of a norm is often uncertain and connicting. In this paper we propose a model for arguing about legal interpretation , which considers the problems of vagueness. After motivating our adoption of graded categories as a tool to tackle the problem of open texture in legal interpretation, we introduce a model based on fuzzy logic and argumentation. Then, we conduct a case study by using an example from medically assisted reproduction.
Document type :
Conference papers
Liste complète des métadonnées

Cited literature [33 references]  Display  Hide  Download

https://hal.inria.fr/hal-01672343
Contributor : Andrea G. B. Tettamanzi <>
Submitted on : Sunday, December 24, 2017 - 12:30:45 PM
Last modification on : Monday, November 5, 2018 - 3:52:10 PM

File

ICAIL2017-authorversion.pdf
Files produced by the author(s)

Identifiers

Collections

Citation

Célia Da Costa Pereira, Andrea G. B. Tettamanzi, Beishui Liao, Alessandra Malerba, Antonino Rotolo, et al.. Combining Fuzzy Logic and Formal Argumentation for Legal Interpretation. ICAIL 2017 - 16th International Conference on Articial Intelligence and Law, Jun 2017, London, United Kingdom. pp.49-58, ⟨10.1145/3086512.3086532⟩. ⟨hal-01672343⟩

Share

Metrics

Record views

335

Files downloads

423