Skip to Main content Skip to Navigation

Do moldable applications perform better on failure-prone HPC platforms?

Abstract : This paper compares the performance of di erent approaches to tolerate failures using checkpoint/restart when executed on large-scale failure-prone platforms. We study (i) Rigid applications, which use a constant number of processors throughout execution; (ii) Moldable applications, which can use a di erent number of processors after each restart following a fail-stop error; and (iii) GridShaped applications, which are moldable applications restricted to use rectangular processor grids (such as many dense linear algebra kernels). For each application type, we compute the optimal number of failures to tolerate before relinquishing the current allocation and waiting until a new resource can be allocated, and we determine the optimal yield that can be achieved. We instantiate our performance model with realistic applicative scenarios and make it publicly available for further usage.
Document type :
Complete list of metadata

Cited literature [18 references]  Display  Hide  Download
Contributor : Equipe Roma Connect in order to contact the contributor
Submitted on : Thursday, May 24, 2018 - 6:11:49 PM
Last modification on : Thursday, September 29, 2022 - 2:58:07 PM
Long-term archiving on: : Saturday, August 25, 2018 - 2:52:47 PM


Files produced by the author(s)


  • HAL Id : hal-01799498, version 1



Valentin Le Fèvre, George Bosilca, Aurelien Bouteiller, Thomas Herault, Atsushi Hori, et al.. Do moldable applications perform better on failure-prone HPC platforms?. [Research Report] RR-9174, Inria Grenoble Rhône-Alpes. 2018, pp.1-24. ⟨hal-01799498⟩



Record views


Files downloads