Skip to Main content Skip to Navigation
Journal articles

Selection bias in the reported performances of AD classification pipelines

Abstract : The last decade has seen a great proliferation of supervised learning pipelines for individual diagnosis and prognosis in Alzheimer's disease. As more pipelines are developed and evaluated in the search for greater performance, only those results that are relatively impressive will be selected for publication. We present an empirical study to evaluate the potential for optimistic bias in classification performance results as a result of this selection. This is achieved using a novel, resampling-based experiment design that effectively simulates the optimisation of pipeline specifications by individuals or collectives of researchers using cross validation with limited data. Our findings indicate that bias can plausibly account for an appreciable fraction (often greater than half) of the apparent performance improvement associated with the pipeline optimisation, particularly in small samples. We discuss the consistency of our findings with patterns observed in the literature and consider strategies for bias reduction and mitigation.
Complete list of metadata

Cited literature [43 references]  Display  Hide  Download
Contributor : Marco Lorenzi <>
Submitted on : Friday, July 27, 2018 - 2:11:57 PM
Last modification on : Friday, October 25, 2019 - 5:12:05 PM
Long-term archiving on: : Sunday, October 28, 2018 - 1:11:08 PM


Publication funded by an institution


Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License




Alex F. Mendelson, Maria A. Zuluaga, Marco Lorenzi, Brian F. Hutton, Sébastien Ourselin. Selection bias in the reported performances of AD classification pipelines. Neuroimage-Clinical, Elsevier, 2017, 14, pp.400 - 416. ⟨10.1016/j.nicl.2016.12.018⟩. ⟨hal-01843390⟩



Record views


Files downloads